The basic functions differ from each other in color and lighten up the user interface. In terms of design, Foxit PDF Editor comes out on top in our view after opening the software. In addition, the user cannot use the OCR feature with the trial version, which means PDFelement may not recognize text passages in images reliably or at all.That is, should a file with, for example, 5 pages be converted, the trial version spits out only 2 pages. When a PDF file is converted to another format, such as Word or Excel, this process is limited to 2 pages.Changes made to a PDF file will result in a watermark being added to each page of the document when it is saved.These restrictions must be accepted with the trial version: However, this can only be used to its full extent after the software has been purchased. Wondershare, on the other hand, grants the user unlimited access to the trial version. The latter can be used to its full extent during the test phase, but is unusable once it expires. Both PDFelement and Foxit PDF Editor have advantages and disadvantages. However, for the sake of completeness, a comparison of both test versions is useful. We don’t want to say too many words about it. Test versions in comparison: PDFelement vs.

After all, we want to find out what the respective software can do. Nevertheless, we have installed both tools. Thus, in our opinion, Foxit PDF Editor’s offer is aimed more at the business sector.

However, while the trial version on the manufacturer’s site of the former can be downloaded quite simply with a click, the developer of the latter first asks for a handful of personal data including the name of a company. Foxit PDF Editorīoth Wondershare’s PDFelement and Foxit PDF Editor are easy to find via search engine.

Test versions in comparison: PDFelement vs.

Pdfelement review